Monthly Archives: January 2013

Letter To Anger

ImageDear anger,

I write you this letter to inform you that things won’t work between us. It’s not me it’s you. You are always there, waiting for me at the peak. You make me do things that I don’t intend; you make me say things that I don’t mean. You promise me serenity but all you offer is regret. Your existence is beyond justification. Your force is beyond measure.  I wish I could tame you; I wish we could be friends. I understand that you want your freedom; I understand that you want to escape, but I can’t let you, because I may lose my self along the way. Every time you show up, I promise myself that things will be different the next time. I put more locks and I build higher walls, but you always find your way. Sometimes I wish you could just disappear, and then I stop, I think and I realize that we are one. Maybe I am blinded by justifications; maybe it’s my fault. I blame you all the time, but I never try to change. My vision is distorted; my thoughts are hazy. I need more time to think.  Sorry, things won’t work between us. It’s not you it’s me. 

Moufti

Advertisements
Tagged , , , , , , , ,

“simplicity is the ultimate sophistication”

-Leonardo da Vinci 

“simplicity is …

Tagged , , , , , ,

An Egyptian Dream: A Response To Insanity

 Image “ I’ll tell you a riddle. You’re waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don’t know for sure. But it doesn’t matter.”(Inception 2010). Sadly, this rings a bell; this rings a bell to most of us, the Egyptians.  In Egypt, our hope is not getting to our destination on time; our hope is to make it, alive. But it doesn’t matter, because if you have a family member who was deceased in a train accident, there is a good chance the government will compensate you with money; money that is nearly enough to buy the latest iPhone. In fact, we should look at the bright side. We have a president that appears in short videos to sooth our agonies. We have hospitals not ready with medicine but ready with broadcasts and tweets to ask for money, volunteers and supplies. We have government officials who refuse to resign or take responsibility, but are humble enough to apologize. The current situation concerning how crisis is being dealt with in Egypt can be described in one word, “insanity”.

Did I ever tell you the definition of insanity?  Insanity is doing the exact same thing over and over again, expecting things to change. Every single catastrophe, the one’s responsible think “this time it is going to be different”. As a side note, I have asked myself how vague I was, when I attributed the blame on “the one’s responsible”? I found that my description was too vague and that’s when I realized the actual tragedy.

Heartbreakingly the amount of people who are responsible is indefinite; there are several people who are considered to be responsible. Consequently that brings us to a psychosocial phenomenon titled “Diffusion of responsibility”. Basically, Diffusion Of Responsibility occurs when a person is less likely to assume responsibility for an action when there are others who share the responsibility. In Diffusion Of Responsibility, the individual either assumes that other people are responsible for taking action or assumes that other people have already taken action. In other words, have you ever passed by an accident and made the assumption that somebody else has called for help? In a perfect demonstration of Diffusion Of Responsibility, everyone assumes that the other one has called for help and the ending result would be no one calling for help. I see that this is fairly analogous to the situation in Egypt. The time we start pointing fingers is also the time when we realize that we do not have enough fingers. 

I remember around 7 years ago, my school implemented a method called “ the call chain”. The call chain is a cycle, where each student is accountable to inform another student about class information. Each student had a back-up plan if the person the student was trying to call, did not pick up. If the student did not deliver the message, he or she is responsible for all the other students who did not get the message and that student faces consequences. A call chain system would look something like this:

Teacher → student 1→  student 2→ student 3→ Teacher

Only now I have comprehended the importance of this system. Unlike the Egyptian governmental system; in the call chain, responsibility is not diffused; responsibilities, roles and consequences are explicitly assigned and well explained.

Sometimes individuals don’t want to be liable for failure, so they force the responsibility to be diffused by placing the blame on anything but them. When a person succeeds, he or she attributes that success to their personality; however, when a person fails he or she attributes that failure to the situation. For example, if a beggar approached a man walking on the street and the man decided to give him money. The man’s first thoughts may be “oh! That was kind from me, I am generous because I shared my money with someone who needed it”; however, the man ignored the fact that the beggar asked him for the money several times before he decided to give him the money. Days later the same man goes to a restaurant and the waiter mistakenly forgot to bring him skimmed milk with his coffee, so the man starts shouting at the waiter in anger. After the man calms down his first thoughts may be “ I knew this day was going to be a bad day since the moment I saw that black cat in the morning ” or he may think “everyone was getting on my nerves today and that waiter was not professional so he deserved it anyway”. Contrary to the preceding scenario, the man’s first thoughts were not “ I am ill tempered, that’s why I shouted at the waiter”; the man simply attributed success to his good nature and attributed failure to the surroundings. This response is somewhat similar to the response of the Egyptian government officials, when they succeed they praise themselves and their far-sighted planning, but when they fail they blame it on “the third party”.

In Egypt, one of the major flops is management.  The government provides short-term solutions, rather than preventive measures. What we need is a Business Continuity Plan (BCP). A business continuity plan is a map for continuing procedures under adverse conditions such as a fire, or excessive rain. BCP minimizes risk and saves lives. In other words, it is not only expecting the unexpected, but also having a plan to deal with that “unexpected”.

 We need government officials on the streets doing audits, not in their office all the time doing only paper work. The process of reforming supervision needs to be top-bottom. If the supervisor with the highest rank was doing his job, the worker with the lowest rank will be also doing his job. Just like the call chain, responsibility should be assigned specifically to prevent diffusion. Also the government needs to have incentives of safety and freedom to work efficiently. For example, the government should have a wide time frame to fulfill certain goals, and at the end of that time frame, the government can be judged fairly.

I am not here to judge governments; I am here to raise ideas to be further developed. I dream of the day where we know for sure where the train will take us, a day that we no longer witness insanity; I dream of the day where every Egyptian receives fair education and has equal rights.

 -Moufti

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Quote of the day

ما اعظم ان تكون غائبا حاضرا على ان تكون حاضرا غائبا

Quote of the day

Tagged ,

from a different angle

Rebellious Observation

SunsetRoad

My fingers dangle over the steering wheel of my ’65 mustang, melodically tapping to the beat of my favorite Rolling Stones jam. Cigarette smoke lingers in front of my lips. For a brief moment the smoke dances, bidding farewell as if it were the soul of a forsaken gypsy on its way out my window before alas it vanishes into the blistering summer air of the god-forsaken Mojave Desert. I’m driving straight into a fiery sun that sits atop the horizon. My eyes are squinted into hell-harrowing slits because I forgot my damned Ray Bans at some grimy Indian reservation gas station 300 miles back.

I’m tired and worn. I think of the road I’ve traveled and I look onward, into oblivion, because the road just keeps going. It never stops. I look at the course of human history and it seems to me that when people chased dreams they…

View original post 793 more words

The Niqab Of Gyges

        Earlier today I was having my random thoughts and it crossed my mind how the criminals wear masks when they commit an act of crime. I came with the conclusion that those criminals wear masks because covering their faces gives them the power to be anonymous to any possible viewers of the crime. So I thought of reversing the process, if we gave a person that has no intention of misconduct a mask, would he or she become an offender? I started looking for an example and that led me to think of “Niqab” (a piece of cloth that covers the face) that is common among the Arab society.

        Recently I have witnessed two incidents concerning women wearing the “Niqab”. The first incident was when a woman wearing the Niqab wanted to get on a bus with one functioning door, so she impatiently pushed against the other women who were trying to get off the bus without giving excuses, which led one of the women to yell at her and start a fight. The second incident was when a woman wearing the Niqab tried selling my friends and I, drugs. I have also read about many stories of women wearing the Niqab who engaged in prostitution, theft, faking identities and other things that may be considered by many people as immoral. I have even met many people who claimed that women in Niqab are the most corrupt. So I started asking questions, are those women under the Niqab initially born evil? Or humans are all born evil and that evil side is more likely to show if one covers his or her face?

        I was not able to draw conclusions because I did not have sufficient tangible evidence to support any of the claims related to the questions above; however, my thoughts led me to a mythical artifact named “The Ring Of Gyges” that was mentioned by the philosopher Plato in his book “The Republic”. Briefly, Gyges was a shepherd in the service of the king of Lydia; one day there was a great storm, and an earthquake made an opening in the earth at the place where Gyges was feeding his flock. Amazed at the sight, he descended into the opening, where he saw a dead body of stature, as appeared to him, more than human, and having nothing on but a gold ring. So Gyges decided to take the ring. Later on, the shepherds met together and according to custom they might send their monthly report about the herds to the king.  Gyges attended the assembly with the ring on his finger. As Gyges was playing around with his ring he turned the collet of the ring in his hand, instantly he became invisible to the company and they began to speak of him as if he were no longer present. He was astonished at this, and realized that turning the collet inwards made him invisible while turning it outwards made him visible again. Using the power of his ring, Gyges made himself chosen to be one of the messengers sent to the King. As soon as Gyges arrived, he seduced the queen, and with her help conspired against the king, murdered him and took the kingdom.

        I am not here to question Gyges’ ethical standards; nonetheless, I see that the ring he has acquired gave him an advantage over the other people. In other words, the ring gave him power. I see that the power the ring gave him is somewhat similar to the power the Niqab gives. The one wearing the Niqab has an anonymous identity that gives a wider window of opportunity to commit sinful acts and get away with them. So Now you are probably wondering if I see that wearing the Niqab necessarily leads one to commit sinful acts? And the answer is: No, as I will illustrate further in the succeeding paragraph.

        As I have reflected on the Niqab I will reflect on politicians. Many politicians start off clean and end up dirty. Is it because politicians are initially nasty people who fake being nice until they what they want? There is a possibility that this is true; yet, rationally speaking, this is not the case. Politicians have an advantage over the other people that is somewhat similar to that advantage given by the Ring Of Gyges or the Niqab, and that advantage is power.

        Once one has power, one is a given a choice, a choice to either be just, fair and altruistic or to be self centered, unjust and corrupt. The decision to have more power is similar to the decision made by Gyges when he decided to keep the ring on or the decision made by a woman who decided to wear the Niqab. With greater power comes greater responsibility and once you have made the choice to have more power, you must realize the responsibility that comes with that power. I am not here to tell you that when you have power you should be nice to everyone. I am here to remind you of how the choices you make when using your advantages, can impact your life and the lives of other people.

—Moufti                                                                                                                           

Citations:  

“The Ring of Gyges.” The Ring of Gyges. Charles.D.Kay, n.d. Web. 13 Jan. 2013.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,